Showing posts with label UK. Show all posts
Showing posts with label UK. Show all posts

2010-09-14

Rebranding Britain



September issue of Monocle magazine brings an interesting look
upon UK's (new possible) brand.

A edição de Setembro da revista Monocle apresenta uma abordagem
interessante sobre um rebrand da marca Reino Unido.
_

2010-09-02

Sherlock

2010-07-21

The Iraq Inquiry



I've been following the Iraq Inquiry since the beginning in the end of 2009, and all evidence and statements made never cease the idea of a bad judgment, a wrong plan and a political mistake of global proportions to go forward along the USA in the illegal invasion of Iraq. Even if the highest senior leaders of Her Majesty's Government, such as Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, or Jack Straw and Alistair Campbell continue deluding us with rhetorical arguments, the fact is many others - military and intelligence officers, legal advisers, and so on - heard at this very inquiry, have presented different views, facts and figures that corroborate injustifiable reasons and options to go to war and a mislead campaign to win it. This is still what comes out as common feeling, enhanced by yesterdays' statements by former MI5 boss Baroness Eliza Manningham-Buller, and in particular the obvious backdraft effect of Britain's role in the Iraq offensive that led to the increased risk of terrorist attacks in the UK, with 16 avoided and one accomplished.

The big question here is what will overcome from these hearings on the final report. This inquiry is not a court, but will it be capable to assemble sustainable documented proof to charge the ones responsable and hold them accountable?
This, as always, is a political game, and it's a nasty one.


The Independent
Former MI5 chief demolishes Blair's defence of the Iraq war

The Guardian
Former MI5 chief delivers damning verdict on Iraq invasion

SkyNews interactive timeline of the Iraq Inquiry with many video reports of the hearings



Tenho acompanhado o inquérito britânico sobre o Iraque (The Iraq Inquiry) desde o seu começo no fim de 2009, e pelos depoimentos apresentados nunca cessa a ideia que houve uma má interpretação, um plano errado e um erro político de proporções globais ao alinhar com os EUA na ilegal invasão deste país. Mesmo que os líderes e outros membros do governo britânico, Tony Blair e Gordon Brown, ou Jack Straw e Alistair Campbell nos continuem a iludir com argumentos de retórica, factos e visões várias têm sido apresentadas por militares, serviços de inteligência, advogados e juristas, corroborando a ideia de injustificadas razões e opções para a guerra e uma mal preparada campanha para a vencer. É isto que continua a transparecer ainda para mais com o depoimento de ontem por parte da ex-directora do MI5 a Baronesa Eliza Manningham-Buller, e em particular o óbvio efeito de resposta pelo papel do Reino Unido na invasão/ocupação do Iraque que aumentou os riscos de ataques terroristas em território britânico, com 16 evitados e um conseguido a 7 Julho de 2005.

A grande questão aqui é o que virá no relatório final após todos estes depoimentos. Este inquérito não é um tribunal, mas terá capacidade para reunir sustentáveis provas documentais para acusações legais?
Como sempre, é um jogo político, e pode ser bem mauzinho.
_

2010-07-09

The Third Man

2010-05-12

A new kind of Government




To be quite honest and direct, the outcome of a coalition government held by the Conservative Party and the Liberal Democratic Party seems, not necessarily the best, but as the only way forward. The past days showed us much of the pros and cons of all hipothesis. Changing the electoral and political system has become even more urgent.

As I always believed, Labour had already sentenced is fate and had no other way out than to stay out. Gordon Brown left Number 10 with dignity. If David Miliband presents his much desired candidacy for leadership, it might seem too late, but it's an obvious outcome of inner political strategy.

The LibDem result was a frustrating surprise. But my support for Nick Clegg continues, as I believe in his political views and his honesty, a leader who will do his best to carry out the changes needed to build a fairer future for the United Kingdom, trying to avoid too many right-wing policies that float around the Tories minds.

Politics is an art of compromise, and pulling out the best of ideas in a diverse and plural project is in fact a new cornerstone for a new kind of government. And - lets hope - must be achieved by this team lead by David Cameron and Nick Clegg.
_

2010-05-04

A fresh start



Where we stand today
It is time for something different. Not a cliché that almost every party shouts out, but truely a belief that difference can be possible this time. These last years have brought too many reasons for effective change to happen, the absolute need to turn things around in order to clean up politics and ensure a better future.
Entering the second decade of the 21st Century gave us an insight that the world changes ever more faster and the present methods aren't powerfull enough to make things better.

No more Gordon
Labour with its current leadership hasn't anything more to offer, because 10+3 years is enough. Blair and Brown gave Britain a new stand in Europe and the world, an exciting appeal, a brand new vision opposite of the Thatcher years, redistributive tax credits, doubled spending on the NHS, the minimum wage. But the fall of Labour became clear with the illegal Iraq war from then on, despite the recognised effort of Gordon Brown towards the world economic and financial breakdown.
Looking back we can see that Gordon failed as Prime-Minister. Indeed it started with high expectations but along these three years he gave too much evidence of weakness at home opposed to world leadership. But in the end, what matters is the job at Downing Street and what the Number 10 occupier can, and must, do for the country, for everyone living in the UK. And it is obvious that what lies ahead cannot be faced by the Labour party because they have no solutions and working projects for the future. Labour lost its chance by not being able to refresh its leadership.

A Tory illusion of change
And that it is also why neither the Conservatives have what it takes to improve the UK. David Cameron wants to brake Broken Britain by braking it another way. Big Society might seem a nice idea, but it feels a demagocic talk with no true consequence in every day life. They might look green but they have among them anti-climate change members. Their anti-Europe claims have been charmed by the Euro/Greece crisis, but it only represents a wrong position of the importance of the EU for the UK because they both need eachother in this new Europe. And what the expenses scandal brought last year doesn't seem enough for them to change the functionality of british politics, with no reform of the way the country should work better.
Cameron seems a nice chap, made his way up in five years of opposition but, as we can see in every poll, he hasn't done enough to make people trust him. The Conservative Party has old thinking with modern looks. They say they are change, with them in power change would come but not in the way to give a real choice of better change. They are selling an illusion of change.

A fresh start
The "change" label is only reliable with a different way of politics and project, attitude and ideas, hope and fairness. Only a strategic vision can be a solution for the future. By acknowledging the flaws of yesterday and understanding the realities of today, building a new way of thinking and working can achieve the chances for a better tommorow.
It is no utopian talk, things can be made different with a new set of ideas and challenges that only the Liberal Democrats present.
The LibDems feel with accuracy that this election is a huge opportunity to reform the electoral system, to bring transparent and fair tools into politics, reflecting on how the country should and must work upon. The LibDems always had green policies, even before other parties. They believe in education as a true value. They are for a new nuclear-weapon tactical policy. The LibDems are European.
Nick Clegg is a new and fresh hope to ensure political reform, fair taxes, social mobility, sustainable economic growth. A good future for the United Kingdom can only be shaped with 21st Century policies and only the Liberal Democrats have the transformative ideas, trust and the will to make it happen.


On 6 May vote Liberal Democrats
_

2010-05-03

2010-04-23

Saint George's Day



Every year this discussion comes around. What is England? What is englishness and how do english perceive their country? How does History and Modernity join to build a nation?
It's the eternal question of "who am I, where do I come from, where do I go".
What are the definitions of ourselves when it comes to the place where you were born? Do we feel some kind of energy that keeps us attached no matter what? Should the sense of belonging to a land be more symbolic or more patriotic? How close must one feel to a place?

Today is the day of Saint George. And the death of William Shakespeare.
And therefore, the Day of England.

Sharing the name with this religious-mythological-symbolic character has always brought me closer to a land that has left in me a strange feeling of presence despite being distant. I try to keep my link everyday, knowing that this orphan sense of relationship is built on the need that everyone has to know where they come from. There must be some kind of completion that helps to shape a character, a personality, ingredients that mould inner beliefs, a stronghold ground of truth that brings meaning for existance.
England gave me my background values with its sense of fair play, the eagerness to know, the grandeur of History and Culture, the difference of being, the audacity of humour. And these I will always cherish in my heart and mind.
_

2010-04-19

Green Party

2010-04-09

Think Different. Think Plaid



The UK General Elections are coming and an exciting campaign too. So the political messages and the way they are broadcasted are due to make a difference.
Like this video from Welsh nationalist party Plaid Cymru literally does. Expanding the famous Apple claim "Think Different" added by "Think Plaid", it's good to see how a political concept can be explained when made with design and simplicity, can be fresh and seductive, aims to reach out with an attitude to connect people to a common goal with meaningful objectives.
And what I most enjoy about this video is how, as seen since the SNP won in Scotland, that much more than a multicultural approach, Plaid shows a strong understanding of what our world is today. Because the whole world lives in our neighbourhoods, our towns, our countries - we are one world, we are one people - but never neglecting the sense of place and love and commitment to where we live and belong.
It is a statement that marks an alliance between the old and the new, the proud historical and cultural heritages of "natives" and newcomers, with the empowering modernity and exchange as a gateway for achievement, for fair development, for a better future.
_

2010-04-01

No nukes

2010-02-01

A Brand for London


The GLA has announced Saffron as the winner for the new London brand.
But before knowing yet how it looks like, how about a visit to the blog A Brand for London.
An open initiative from Moving Brands that presents many interesting visions made by them (images above) and other designers who freely gave some of their time and knowledge with their interpretation of what a brand for Englands' capital might or should be.






- - - - -


- - - - -




And here is venturethree's bold proposal:

2009-11-30

Your Scotland, Your Voice


Launch of a white paper setting out constitutional options
and paving way for a referendum bill on Scotland's future.
_

2009-07-07

Hyde Park Memorial For 7/7 Bombing Victims




2009-06-04

Politics and plots



Day in, day out it seems everything is falling to pieces. Time has become a terrible dreadlock and no matter how Prime-Minister Gordon Brown tries do move on with his job, believing his duty is to remake a broken instituition, the fact is he has lost control over what he should have held as most important - the Government itself. Despite the mission - as he believes it is - of leading the country, as no other well prepared man before him, the fact is he, as a politician, has fallen defeated before his unability to cope with (modern) politics as a game, with politics as an image.

Gordon Brown's role in politics has been a life commitment, a job handled with technical skills and with a vision of equal development and justice for all. We may say he's not telegenic, but a politician cannot relie, or build, its position or reputation based only on a smiley face. There must be substance. And Gordon Brown has substance. For years he has shown proofs of dedication and working policies, and achieved objectives for the good of the UK and, most recently, even for the sake of world economic structure. Labour Party has brought Britain remarkable changes. His premiership has tried to continue to promote and pursue ways for a better country.

When he took office almost two years ago (amid rumours of months of plots...) his reputation and expectation was high. But ever since the step back on a snap election - that should have been held even before - several signs of misunderstanding the moments and the foreplays, and the proper way to lead a team such as the government have not been gone unnoticed. Has Gordon Brown been a good PM? But surely not a good leader. His authority within the Labour party is time and time again questioned. His skills in politics as a mind game, or even as dangerous game, has led the public eye to see him as blind, weak and unreachable. The thing is that his worth as a senior politcian has been broken because of his bad handling of situations and people, close in his team, or in Labour.

So the plotting season is open again. It may look akward, disloyal, horrible. But again, the PM is not seeing the full picture. Is remaining in power the best for the party and the country? What's at stake now is a new leader for Labour, and therefore, a new Prime-Minister. Why? Because of the crisis, the expenses scandal, the rising Conservative Party, the lack of vision for a new democracy. But can a new Labour leader fight against all these odds? Does a new Labour leader, in face of recent events, have the ability, power and trust to handle, shake and change things until an election a year from now? Is plot politics a good way to expell bad politics, or is it just a matter of character, or the lack of it?

Whatever we forecast for the next days, either way Gordon Brown has his days numbered. He may feel, and most certainly beleive his work is not over. But his plans so far - regarding a "new politics" - have not gone far enough. Real change must come, otherwise people more and more will think the worse of Westminster. Real change however, does not come with the Conservative Party. David Cameron is bright, clever and eager to kick off Labour, but his recent associations in Europe with some right-wing parties truely shows a very different and wrong path for Britain.
Bad luck knocked at Gordon's door. All his life he must have dreamed to be PM, and now, sooner or later he'll be sacked just like Margaret Thatcher. Isn't that strange?

At first I couldn't reach an opinion, but due to what has happend and what I have read, I find myself close to yesterdays' Guardian editorial position. A job done, missed opportunities, no future.
I have no way to know who would be best to lead Labour. How well do we know someone able enough to handle such a job? But it is a matter of character after all. That is what people see and feel. The challenge is to add that with substance, good ideas, transforming policies, transparent attitudes, leadership.
But with the current mistrust, can Labour deliver? Is the Labour Party able to avoid defeat in a general election?
So who's ready to take the risk?

_

2009-05-24

The end of innocence and a new beginning



The end of innocence and a new beginning

In life we hold some things for granted, some things as sacred, and others as trustworthy. We demand and expect from others the same values and principles that hold ourselves as individuals, coleagues, parents, citizens. A democracy, as imperfect as it may be, still is nevertheless the best political system that has ensured freedom, justice, development and peace. And those who dedicate their work, life and ideas to politics and public office, have even more responsability to uphold and ensure all these beliefs.
And for centuries, despite black sheep that may and have existed among us, the nobility of politics, the credibility of public service, has always kept its high standards. A formidable parliamentarian history such as ours is a question of honor and pride all over the country and the world. Britain's extraordinary virtues of democratic values and its political system have been regarded as an example.
When the recession came in hard as it did, the banks were a instituition we never hoped not to distrust. If you cannot trust the banks with our money, who can you then? Brick by brick, trust and disbelief came crumbling down.

And now, the upmost place we could call as our own house of principles and values, shows its true color. Descredit in politians has always been around, but in our collective innocence, we've hoped and voted for a better chance, a better way, a better change, a better democracy. All this MP expenses affair falls in to the ridiculous, the exaggeration, the abuse of priviliges, the disrespect of a supposed noble and credible and public position. It is a shame. How can anyone believe a word of an MP? How can some MPs have the nerve to say "we must not allow this to happen again"? How can the people from now on deliver its vote without wondering "when will I be fooled again?", or "they're just in it for the money"? This must not be the way to see and feel politics, nor the way some have indeed turned it into.

What we have seen is, as Gordon Brown so correctly said, Westminster, through this polite english manner has been a gentleman's club, that writes and manages its own rules and rights. This must end. All this scandal puts politics at stake and democracy at risk. Reform and change must come to the inside walls of the House. Reform and change must come to the inside walls of Whitehall (remember the email smears?). Reform and change must come to the inside walls of British politics.
There is no turning back. These past weeks and days, politicians are trying to make amends - some for the true sake of politics, others for their own.
Changes must be discussed. Changes must be done.

The good thing is that this new crisis brings the opportunity and the challenge to discuss the true meaning of politics and democracy. This is an amazing chance to rethink and gather many views. And into what we want as participants of the political process. Here lies a moment to write a new chapter for Britain's 21st century democracy.
Checks and balances must be truely concieved and put at order. Maybe it is time for a written Constitution.

And then a general election must be held as soon as possible. To evict the bad MPs, to sustain the good, to renew the Parliament, to restart a government.
To ensure and regain the ethics, values and the trust of politics and democracy as whole.



The Guardian has a special page here and a PDF supplement "A New Politics".





O fim da inocência e um novo começo


Na vida temos algumas coisas que consideramos garantidas, outras como sagradas, e outras como dignas de confiança. Exigimos e esperamos dos outros os mesmos valores e princípios que nós próprios enquanto indivíduos, colegas, pais, cidadãos nos regemos. A democracia, sendo imperfeita, é contudo o único e melhor sistema político que garante a justiça, o desenvolvimento e a paz. E aqueles que dedicam o seu trabalho, as suas ideias e a suas vidas ao serviço público, têm maior responsabilidade para defender e assegurar estas crenças.
Durante séculos, apesar de ovelhas ranhosas que vão surgindo, a nobreza da política e a credibilidade do serviço público, têm estado no Reino Unido sempre em elevados níveis. Uma história parlamentar formidável é uma questão de honra e de orgulho por todo o país e para o mundo. As extraordinárias virtudes e valores democráticos britânicos têm sido visto como um exemplo.
Quando a recessão caiu com toda a força, os bancos foram a instituição que não esperávamos desconfiar. Se não podemos confiar o nosso dinheiro aos bancos, a quem podemos? Pedra sobre pedra, a confiança e o descrédito foram caíndo.

E agora, o local que se podia chamar a Casa desses príncipios e valores demonstrou a sua verdadeira face. Sempre existiu descrédito nos políticos, mas creio que numa inocência colectiva, os britânicos, e aqueles que observam a realidade britânica, tinham no acto de votar a crença para melhores oportunidades, melhores modos, melhores mudanças, melhor democracia. Todo este escândalo à volta das despesas dos deputados cai tanto no exagero, no abuso dos seus poderes, como no ridículo e no desrespeito que um cargo público credibiliza. É uma vergonha. Como pode alguém acreditar agora na palavra de um deputado? Como podem alguns deputados ter o desplante de dizer "não podemos permitir que isto volte a acontecer"? Como poderá o eleitor a partir de agora impedir no seu pensamento que "vão enganar-me de novo", ou "eles só estão nisto pelo dinheiro"? Não deve ser este o modo como ver e sentir a política, ou tão pouco como alguns de facto o têm tornado.

O que vimos, como o primeiro-ministro Gordon Brown tão bem disse, que neste jeito inglês educado, Westminster tem sido um Clube de Cavalheiros que faz as suas próprias regras. Isto tem de acabar. Todo este escândalo coloca a política em risco e a democracia em causa. Reforma e mudança têm de chegar dentro das paredes de Westminster. Reforma e mudança têm de entrar dentro das paredes de Whitehall, a sede do governo (recordam-se dos emails de falsas acusações?). Reforma e mudança têm de estar dentro das paredes da política britânica.
Não há como voltar atrás. Nas últimas semanas e nestes dias mais recentes, os políticos têm feito esforços para corrigir as coisas - uns pelo bem da política, outros para seu próprio bem.
As mudanças devem ser debatidas. As mudanças devem ser implementadas.

O lado bom desta crise tornou-se numa oportunidade e num desafio para discutir o verdadeiro significado da política e da democracia. É uma óptima possiblidade para repensar e reunir muitas ideias e atrair cada vez mais participantes para o processo político. É um momento para todos poderem escrever um novo capítulo para a democracia do séc. XXI.
Freios e contrapesos (no inglês, checks and balances) devem ser concebidos e colocados em prática. Talvez seja o momento para uma Constituição escrita.

E depois, o mais breve possível, eleições gerais devem ter lugar. Para expulsar os maus deputados, premiar os bons, renovar o Parlamento, reiniciar o Governo.
Para assegurar e fazer regressar a ética, os valores e a confiança na política e na democracia como um todo.



The Guardian tem uma página especial e um PDF chamado "A New Politics".
_

2009-03-18

Keep Calm and Carry On



Um poster feito por um simples cidadão por alturas dos ataques V2 a Londres, na Segunda Guerra Mundial, está a voltar a fazer furor no Reino Unido face à crise cada vez mais densa.
O poder da mensagem escrita, num contexto de união de valores comuns, de modo a dar a volta por cima.
_
A poster made by a simple english citizen when London was under the V2 bombings, during World War II, is making a very interesting return int the UK due to the ever deeper crisis.
The power of the written message, in a context of common values gathered to make the best of it.

via The Guardian.
http://www.keepcalmandcarryon.com

_

2009-02-25

A New Bus for London



O Mayor de Londres Boris Johnson e a Transport of London, lançaram em 2008 um concurso de ideias para renovar a frota dos icónicos Routemaster buses, os famosos autocarros vermelhos de dois pisos introduzidos em 1954.
Este mês foram anunciados dois finalistas que, ao longo dos próximos meses deverão apresentar protótipo real e planificação de produção.

The Mayor of London Boris Johnson and the Transport of London, issued in 2008 a competition to renew the iconic fleet of Routemaster buses, the famous two-deck red buses introduced in 1954.
The two finalists were known this month, and through the following months they are to present a real size prototype and a detailed production plan.



Este tipo de transporte, para além de todo o simbolismo da sociedade e cultura britânicas é obviamente um excelente veículo para a cidade. Se se constroi em altura dada a escassez de espaço, a optimização do transporte de passageiros de forma vertical torna-se benéfica para a menor ocupação horizontal do espaço rodoviário. E sendo uma ideia com várias décadas, a reformulação do conceito para a Londres do século XXI (onde também cabe a intenção de "matar" os buses articulados introduzidos pelo anterior mayor Ken Livingstone) contribui para definir soluções de design e sustentabilidade melhor elaboradas para o transporte de passageiros.

Estão em exibição no London Transport Museum (Covent Garden, de 14 Fev - 29 Março) todas as propostas apresentadas.




Aston Martin and Foster + Partners



Capoco Design


Outras propostas

2009-02-15

British Design Classics stamps